Period 15 is Interesting because there are so many spam proposals. The “ETIP-1: Update ETI collateral for proposals submissions” is the only proposal worth reading on this page.
Main Proposal:
IFPS content copied:
“Intent:
This ETIP proposes to increase the ETI collateral required to submit proposals from 10 ETI
to 1000 ETI.
Motivations:
Etica is a system requiring collateral to submit proposals. This is a protection of the network
against spam and bad activity. In fact the collateral limits the number of proposals one
person can submit within a certain period of time and forces the person to submit useful
proposals that will not put at risk its collateral.
The current ETI collateral required to submit proposals is 10 ETI. The issue is that at current
ETI price this collateral worth is in the range of 0.5 usd. So anyone can submit proposals
almost risk free and spam the network in hope of getting the ETI weekly rewards.
Proposed solution:
I propose to increase ETI collateral cost to match a higher usd value. This targeted usd
value can be chosen by the community in the future but for now I propose to increase ETI
collateral cost to target 100 usd range. At current ETI price this would increase ETI collateral
to submit proposals to 1000 ETI.
This process can be reproduced each time the ETI price range changes. For instance, ETI
collateral would be set to 100 ETI when ETI enters a $1 range, 10 ETI when ETI is in a $10
range, and so on.
Implementation:
If this proposal is accepted the Etica smart contract byte code will be updated in order to
increase the ETI collateral amount from 10 ETI to 1000 ETI.
Author Kevin Wad
0xFcCD0af3446C1E847d57920Ec96b17b12b6648AD”
This proposal is not Medical Reasearch but about the protocol. Feel free to vote as you wish.
Other Proposals:
All other proposals were posted by this adress: 0x7a767a4d548b94149aa9dd478be757128b04007ae1d70aeb7ee125e984895928
It is a known Spam Proposal address, there are no sources, content is plagirized from the web. This brings little value to the Etica ecosystem. I recomend voting against these.